Sefism is free for learners. We are here to help you grow, one step at a time.Join for free
Sefism.
Product engineeringProduct company

Workday

Builds cloud applications for human resources, payroll, finance and planning used by large organisations.

Not known4 stage process documentedFounded 2005
Headquarters

Pleasanton, California, United States

Headcount

5,000 and up

5,000 or more people
Work model

Not known

Hiring

Not known

Not enough signal to say. Check the careers page directly.
Where to apply

No careers page on file yet. Try their LinkedIn or the job boards below.

Website

Ask for a referral to Workday

A referral only means something if the person giving it can actually speak to your work. I will refer you where I know someone on the inside and your profile genuinely fits the role, and I will tell you plainly when I cannot. Either way you get an answer, and a straight one.

  • I read every request. A reply takes a few days, sometimes longer.
  • I will not refer someone for a role their profile does not fit. It wastes your time and costs me the contact.
  • Where I cannot refer you, I will say why, and point you at the way in that does work.
  • Nothing you send here is shared with anyone without you agreeing to it first.

If you found the opening, paste it. It tells me which team you mean.

A Drive, Dropbox or personal-site link is fine. Make sure it opens without a request for access, or I cannot read it.

At least a short paragraph. This is what I would be putting my name behind, so specifics beat adjectives.

Comma separated, up to six. Things you would be happy to be tested on.

How they hire

Based on candidate accounts only: four to five rounds over roughly two to four weeks, with a take-home mostly reported for senior and staff levels. Workday publishes its own candidate guide, which is worth reading before the loop.

  1. 1

    Recruiter screen, about 30 minutes

    Unverified
    Recruiter screen30 minutesRemote

    A phone call about background, motivation and team fit.

  2. 2

    Technical phone screen, about 60 minutes

    Unverified
    Live coding1 hoursRemote

    A medium difficulty coding or object oriented design problem in a shared coding environment.

    CodingOO design
  3. 3

    Take-home assignment (senior and staff roles)

    Unverified
    Take-home assignmentRemote

    An asynchronous task of several hours covering API design, testing and documentation.

    API designTesting
  4. 4

    Virtual onsite

    Unverified
    Panel interviewRemote

    Several rounds covering algorithms, object oriented design, system design and a behavioural conversation.

    AlgorithmsOO designSystem designBehavioural

What comes up

Recurring themes from candidate accounts, not a question bank. Nobody is served by leaked question lists, least of all you in the interview.

  • Maintainable object oriented design

    Unverified

    Extensible designs with clear separation of concerns are valued over clever one-off solutions.

  • Enterprise SaaS system design

    Unverified

    Capacity planning and fault tolerance for multi-customer business software.

  • Behavioural and values

    Unverified

    Team dynamics, deadline management and alignment with company values.

Worth reading before you apply

From the Sefism resource library, matched to the rounds above.

Roadmap
Coding Interview Playbook

A structured learning path through coding interview preparation that brings together data structures and algorithms fundamentals, recursion and the pattern-based approach to coding questions in one order. It totals 77 chapters and 1,054 lessons, with quizzes, flashcards and a certificate. Use it when you have plenty of material but no clear plan for what to study first.

  • Job search
  • DSA
  • Career
Design Gurus · Interview Prep · 3 to 6 months
SubscriptionDetails
Roadmap
FAANG Coding Interview Roadmap

A bundle of five company-specific question courses covering the problems most often reported from Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Google and Oracle coding rounds, each split into easy, medium and hard sets with worked solutions. It suits candidates who already know the core patterns and have a loop booked at one of these companies, and want to rehearse on the questions those interviewers are known to ask.

  • Job search
  • DSA
  • Career
Design Gurus · Interview Prep · 3 to 4 months · Advanced
SubscriptionDetails
Roadmap
System Design Interview Playbook

A learning path that bundles five courses into one sequence for system design preparation: System Design Fundamentals, Grokking the System Design Interview, Advanced System Design Interview Volume II, Grokking Microservices Design Patterns and Grokking Design Patterns for Engineers and Managers. Together they add up to 76 chapters and 666 lessons. It suits engineers who want a complete, ordered curriculum instead of assembling one from scattered posts.

  • System design
  • Job search
  • Career
Design Gurus · System Design · 2 to 4 months
SubscriptionDetails
Course
Advanced System Design Interview, Volume II

The second volume of Grokking the System Design Interview, aimed at senior and staff (L5/L6) design rounds. It works through harder case studies such as a payment system, flash sale, notification service, unique ID generator, Gmail, Reddit, Google Calendar and a code judging system, then goes beneath them with patterns like quorum, write-ahead logs and vector clocks and deep dives into Dynamo, Cassandra, Kafka, Chubby, HDFS, GFS and BigTable.

  • System design
  • Backend
  • Job search
Design Gurus · System Design · About 36 hours · Advanced
SubscriptionDetails
Book
Software Engineering at Google

An O'Reilly book from 2020 by Titus Winters, Tom Manshreck and Hyrum Wright on how Google keeps an enormous codebase healthy over time: team culture, code review, documentation, testing at scale, deprecation, dependency management, large-scale changes and continuous delivery. The full text is free to read online. Most rewarding after a year or two of professional work, when the problems it describes start to look familiar.

  • Career
  • Programming
  • Testing
  • Leadership
Titus Winters, Tom Manshreck and Hyrum Wright · Career Growth · Several weeks · Intermediate
Book
The Missing README: A Guide for the New Software Engineer

A practical book for engineers in their first job, written by two experienced engineering leaders. It covers what university rarely teaches: working in a large codebase, writing operable code, testing, code review, delivery, going on-call, agile planning and working with your manager. Read it in your first months and you will recognise most of what happens around you.

  • Career
  • Programming
  • Testing
Chris Riccomini and Dmitriy Ryaboy (No Starch Press) · Career Growth · 288 pages, about 2 to 3 weeks of evening reading · Beginner
$29.99 print, $23.99 ebookDetails
Browse the whole library

What it pays

Nothing collected for this company yet, and nothing worth guessing at. A made-up range is worse than no range because people negotiate against it.

Add to the Workday page

This library is only as good as what people who have been through it are willing to share. Most of these companies have no hiring process documented anywhere, and one account of what the rounds actually were is worth more than anything I can research from the outside.

What are you adding?

This decides how the claim is labelled on the page. Only someone representing the company can produce an “official” label, and I check that separately.

Year and month.

Comma separated topics, not the questions themselves.

Round by round is ideal: what each one was, how long, remote or in person, and what it covered.


Credit

Anonymous is the default. If you keep it anonymous, nothing identifying you reaches the page: it is published as a candidate account and your name stays with me. Never send anything covered by an NDA, and never send a take-home or a question paper.

Universities they recruit from

No sourced university links yet. A campus drive, a career fair appearance or an internship partnership is what puts a university here.

Add to the Workday page

This library is only as good as what people who have been through it are willing to share. Most of these companies have no hiring process documented anywhere, and one account of what the rounds actually were is worth more than anything I can research from the outside.

What are you adding?

This decides how the claim is labelled on the page. Only someone representing the company can produce an “official” label, and I check that separately.

Year and month.

Comma separated topics, not the questions themselves.

Round by round is ideal: what each one was, how long, remote or in person, and what it covered.


Credit

Anonymous is the default. If you keep it anonymous, nothing identifying you reaches the page: it is published as a candidate account and your name stays with me. Never send anything covered by an NDA, and never send a take-home or a question paper.

How to actually get seen

Practise explaining why a design will stay maintainable as it grows, since clear reasoning about structure is reported to matter as much as a working answer.

Sources

Whole profile last checked 2026-09-22.

Interviewed at Workday? Fill in what changed.

Processes change, rounds get added, tests get replaced. If what you went through was different from what is on this page, tell me and I will update it.

Want me to refer you here?

Send me the role, your CV and a few honest paragraphs on why you fit it. Where I know someone inside and your profile matches, I will make the introduction. Where I cannot, I will tell you why and point you at the route that does work. You get an answer either way.

Ask for a referral to Workday

A referral only means something if the person giving it can actually speak to your work. I will refer you where I know someone on the inside and your profile genuinely fits the role, and I will tell you plainly when I cannot. Either way you get an answer, and a straight one.

  • I read every request. A reply takes a few days, sometimes longer.
  • I will not refer someone for a role their profile does not fit. It wastes your time and costs me the contact.
  • Where I cannot refer you, I will say why, and point you at the way in that does work.
  • Nothing you send here is shared with anyone without you agreeing to it first.

If you found the opening, paste it. It tells me which team you mean.

A Drive, Dropbox or personal-site link is fine. Make sure it opens without a request for access, or I cannot read it.

At least a short paragraph. This is what I would be putting my name behind, so specifics beat adjectives.

Comma separated, up to six. Things you would be happy to be tested on.

Add to the Workday page

This library is only as good as what people who have been through it are willing to share. Most of these companies have no hiring process documented anywhere, and one account of what the rounds actually were is worth more than anything I can research from the outside.

What are you adding?

This decides how the claim is labelled on the page. Only someone representing the company can produce an “official” label, and I check that separately.

Year and month.

Comma separated topics, not the questions themselves.

Round by round is ideal: what each one was, how long, remote or in person, and what it covered.


Credit

Anonymous is the default. If you keep it anonymous, nothing identifying you reaches the page: it is published as a candidate account and your name stays with me. Never send anything covered by an NDA, and never send a take-home or a question paper.

Work with me

Stuck on something specific?

Writing only gets you so far. If you want an answer to your situation rather than the general case, book a session and we will work through it together. Sessions are free for approved Sefism members, and a few slots open each week.